No Gain Without Pain
- 1 Is it better to be safe than sorry?
- 2 What is an example sentence for no gain without pain?
- 3 What is 4 better safe than sorry?
- 4 Did Jane Fonda say No pain no gain?
What does no gain without pain mean?
Idiom. informal. used to say that it is necessary to suffer or work hard in order to succeed or make progress.
Is it better to be safe than sorry?
Better Safe Than Sorry Meaning – The widely used phrase “better safe than sorry” is a pretty self-explanatory proverb. Ultimately, it means it’s better to take any precautions and just be safe, even if it seems excessive or totally unnecessary. It’s just better to do it rather than risk harm or regret later.
- We always use it to encourage caution, especially in situations where there’s potential for danger or severe injury.
- As a parent, I know I use the phrase all the time with my two kids because they’re little daredevils who think nothing can hurt them.
- When they first started riding a bike, I was insistent on them wearing a helmet, even in the driveway.
Was the risk of serious injury there? Probably not. But it was better to be safe than sorry.
What is an example sentence for no gain without pain?
1. No gains without pains.2. We’re going to have to work very hard, but as Chris so succinctly put it, there’s no gain without pain.
Why do we say last but not least?
Examples of Last But Not Least – The first dialogue shows a brother and sister who are listing off their accomplishments for he day. Luke: Ella, did you finish everything on your to-do list for our party? Ella: I finished everything, and even did some additional things! Luke: Like what? Ella: Well, I bought all the decorations, designed and printed the invitations, cleaned the house, and last, but not least, made the cake! Luke: Wow! Good job! The second example shows two friends gossiping about which people in their club are the most annoying. Ray: I used to love coming to this club, but now it’s filled with all these annoying characters. Ricardo: Really? I think most people here are pretty likeable. Whom do you dislike? Ray: Roger, Bob, and Tim are all annoying. And last, but not least, Phil. He’s the worst!
What is 4 better safe than sorry?
It is better to act cautiously beforehand than to suffer afterward.
Who first said better safe than sorry?
Background: – The earliest known use of this proverb is by the Irish novelist Samuel Lover (1797-1868) who used it in his book Rory O’More (1837). Another form of the expression is ‘better be sensible than sorry’.
What term means without pain?
Analgesia. noun. the condition of being unable to feel pain while conscious.
What is the most famous quote from taken?
Taken Speech – ‘A Very Particular Set of Skills’ Revisited “I don’t know who you are. I don’t know what you want. If you are looking for ransom I can tell you I don’t have money, but what I do have are a very particular set of skills. Skills I have acquired over a very long career.
Skills that make me a nightmare for people like you. If you let my daughter go now that’ll be the end of it. I will not look for you, I will not pursue you, but if you don’t, I will look for you, I will find you and I will kill you.” Taken is the rare case of a movie franchise that has grown out of a single speech.
It’s one of few films whose fans quote not just lines but whole blocks of text from the script. Liam Neeson has largely taken over from Harrison Ford in the “family in jeopardy” genre on the strength of that single scene. At least Ford’s thrillers from the 1990s bothered to come up with separate plots and characters.
- With this weekend’s Taken 3, the absurdity of the films’ repetition has passed a new threshold.
- We get it: The women need saving.
- Here’s the man to do it.
- Car chase ensues.
- Fistfight follows the car chase.
- By this point, the Secret Service would have been called out.
- This content is imported from youTube.
You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site. Still, the speech from the original Taken (2008) was brilliant, and it was brilliant in a way almost never seen in the movies. It was a classically structured piece of rhetoric, a but drained of comedy. Aristotle would have loved this speech. And it follows the same structure and uses the same techniques as two of the greatest speeches of the 20th century, albeit ones much more important than what’s found in a popcorn flick: Winston Churchill’s and Martin Luther King, Jr.’s These speeches are incredibly similar even though the situations from which they emerge could not be more different.
The speakers repeat phrases (“I will,” “We shall,” “I have a dream”). Those phrases are predictive; spoken in the future tense. The speeches are very simply expressed, with almost no big words. They combine the abstract (“particular set of skills,” “growing confidence and growing strength,” “the Lord shall be revealed”) with physical details (“I will find you and I will kill you,” “we shall fight in the hills,” “little black boys and black girls”).
They are also delivered unbelievably slowly. Churchill and MLK spoke while facing desperate moments of public reckoning, Liam Neeson while beginning the second act of a middling international action movie. And yet the way of speaking—the technique—is exactly the same.
The reasons the Taken speech works so incredibly well, the reasons everyone remembers it, are the same reasons that people remember other great speeches: These rhetorical structures are built into the substructures of our consciousness and always work. The fact that the Taken speech happens to be an action movie shouldn’t disguise its perfect craftsmanship.
It’s not so great that it deserved two sequels, maybe. On the other hand, it even works when you read it like Kermit the Frog: This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site. PLUS: : Taken Speech – ‘A Very Particular Set of Skills’ Revisited
Did Jane Fonda say No pain no gain?
With 5 years as a F500 consultant and 15 years in C-suite nonprofit roles, I support leaders to elevate communication and collaboration for healthy high performance and greater results. – Published Mar 11, 2021 “No Pain, No Gain” – Jane Fonda Jane Fonda had a catchy phrase back in the 1980s that she used to help motivate people to stay with their fitness workouts when the going got tough – “No pain, no gain!”.
Today, that saying is applied to personal challenges across all areas of our lives. It’s so ingrained in us that we might not stop to ask ourselvesis all this pain really necessary? All of us know pain, but what about its cousin – discomfort, Where’s the line between them and how might it be helpful to distinguish these from the other? And which one is most useful for us as we move towards success and satisfaction in our lives? Got discomfort? “If it doesn’t challenge you, it doesn’t change you.” – Fred DeVito In fairness to Jane, when anyone is working out and breathing hard, they might need to stick to single-syllable rhymes like she did.
That said, I believe that some distinctions between “pain” and “discomfort” are called for when we are talking about motivation and success. I’ll put “Got discomfort?” into the ring as a counter-phrase for now, knowing that it will likely never catch on as Jane’s did.
To further explore the idea of discomfort, imagine a light switch but instead of “on” and “off” the settings are labeled “pain” and “comfort”. Which would you choose on a daily basis? Now imagine a different switch – one of those fancy “dimmer” models. This one has “pain” at one extreme, “comfort” at the other, and “discomfort” right in the middle between them.
Which setting would you choose for maximum learning in your life? Comfort, Pain, and Discomfort “There is no comfort in the learning zone, and no learning in the comfort zone.” – Unknown If you picked the “pain” setting on the great light switch of life -– what’s your belief operating behind this? Are you of the opinion that one must truly suffer to make progress or be successful? How might holding this belief actually slow you down long-term? The belief that one must suffer to make progress or be successful is not generally useful.
- We can and do make progress and learn every day without suffering.
- And to the degree we extend our suffering, we wear ourselves down in body and spirit which makes movement towards what really matters to us that much harder.
- And we tend to buy into this belief because we have been taught that self-indulgence leads to failure.
I invite you to remember a big project you took on that didn’t succeed. First, what was important about this project to you, your team, and your organization? And how did it stretch you to learn and grow? I would suggest that if it really mattered to you, and you stretched and grew from engaging with it, you are much less likely to see it as a failure but rather simply a lesson,
- However, if it wasn’t that important to you or you weren’t stretching or growing much as a result, the failure likely had more to do with a mismatch of required motivation and skills for the task than with you not working hard enough.
- If you chose the “comfort” setting – how’s that working for you? What did you learn today, this week, this month? What seems “impossible” because of how much you would need to learn? Where do you see you’ve settled for less and have traded inspiration for comfort? When have you stayed too long in a place of comfort and “woken up” to realize you are capable of much more? And when have you moved strategically to a place of comfort to restore yourself so that you can rise to even higher achievements ahead? And if you said “discomfort” – how do you bring this into your life consistently? How often do you notice yourself moving the switch into either the “comfort” or “pain” zone – convinced that they are better somehow for your success and satisfaction? To lead a life of continuous learning requires us to seek out and welcome discomfort.
David Peterson, former Senior Director of Executive Coaching and Leadership at Google says, “Staying within your comfort zone is a good way to prepare for today, but it’s a terrible way to prepare for tomorrow.” Flipping the switch “The function of an ideal is not to be realized but, like the North Star, to serve as a guiding point.” – Edward Abbey To be transparent, I like watching movies and eating ice cream.
- I like my comfort time.
- And at times I have definitely pushed too hard and bought into “no pain, no gain” as a way to find success and satisfaction.
- But when I’m reflecting on how I learn best, or when I’m coaching leaders and hearing about their challenges, it becomes obvious that discomfort is clearly a territory to get more comfortable with.
I once worked with a senior leader who would literally “walk through fire” for their organization. They saw pain as their “north star” and followed it to both great success and great failure. Known as someone who ‘got stuff done’, they were also known as ‘a real jerk’ to many around them.
The leader drove themselves and their team relentlessly, until their team members started to move on to new jobs and until the leader’s personal health hit a huge speed bump. Coaching this leader meant helping them re-orient towards a “discomfort” star and learn to sense when they were venturing too far towards a “pain” star.
We investigated what “comfort” meant for them, and how unexplored it was as a restorative place they needed in their life to do their best work. Once they committed to re-orienting, things began to shift. The leader was still known as someone who “got stuff done”, only now they were also known as “someone to look up to” who was willing to work with less experienced leaders to help them find their own north stars to navigate by.