Bemaj Pharmacy

The Cure for Insomnia is a 1987 experimental film directed by John Henry Timmis IV, which was, according to Guinness World Records, the longest running film. At 5,220 minutes long (87 hours, or 3 days and 15 hours) in length, the film has no plot, instead consisting of artist L.D.

What is the longest movie ever made The Cure for Insomnia?

The Cure For Insomnia is acknowledged by Guinness World Records as the longest film ever made. It runs for 85 hours, making Out 1 (13 hours), Die Zweite Heimat (25 hours) and Sátántangó (7 hours) look miniscule by comparison.

What movie is 85 hours long?

What is the longest movie ever made? – There can be different answers to this question depending on what source you consult. Guinness World Records says the longest film ever made is “The Cure for Insomnia” released in 1987, The 85-hour experimental film was directed by John Henry Timmis IV.

1. It was played in its entirety Jan.31 to Feb.3, 1987 at the The School of the Art Institute of Chicago, according to Guinness World Records.
2. The film does not have a distinct plot and features “L.D.
3. Groban reciting his own poem of 4,080 pages, interspliced with X-rated film footage and rock music videos,” according to IMDb.

However, IMDb cites “Logistics”, directed by Daniel Andersson and Erika Magnusson as the longest film by running time, The Swedish film was released in 2012 and spans 857 hours, or 35 days and 17 hours. Just curious?: We’re here to help with life’s everyday questions,

What is the shortest movie of all time?

Fresh Guacamole
Directed by	PES
Written by	PES
Produced by	PES
Distributed by	Showtime ShortsHD

What is the longest single movie ever made?

What is the longest Hollywood movie ever made? – Cleopatra remains the longest Hollywood movie ever made, with a runtime of four hours and eight minutes (248 minutes). This is closely followed by Gone with the Wind, which comes in just 10 minutes behind. Below you’ll find the top five longest Hollywood movies ever made, excluding director’s cuts, ranked in order of runtime:

Cleopatra: 248 minutes (4 hours 8 minutes) Gone with the Wind: 238 minutes (3 hours 58 minutes) Once Upon a Time in America: 229 minutes (3 hours 49 minutes) The Ten Commandments: 220 minutes (3 hours 40 minutes) Lawrence of Arabia: 216 minutes (3 hours 36 minutes)

What movie was 240 hours long?

How ‘Logistics’ Became the Longest Movie of All Time – Image via Logistics Art Project When you open up the field of competition to the realm of documentaries, the race (or marathon) for the title of “Longest Movie of All Time” becomes a bit more contested. Claude Lanzmann ‘s award-winning Holocaust documentary Shoah clocks in at 9 hours 26 minutes,

1. The incorrectly titled The Longest Most Meaningless Movie in the World runs for 48 hours.
2. The more aptly titled The Cure for Insomnia stretches the boundaries to 87 hours, but things are actually just getting warmed up.
3. The documentary Beijing 2003 reaches the 150-hour mark.
4. The movie Modern Times Forever is, by Logistics standards, a paltry 240 hours (or 10 days) long.

But even so, none hold a candle to the runtime of Logistics, All in all, Logistics is a deliberately slow and methodical approach to the overlooked aspects of modern life that immerses the audience in the long and drawn-out process of bringing even what people consider to be the most mundane of objects to the general public.

What movie is 7 hours long?

Cinematic films

Title	Running time	Year released
A Tale of Filipino Violence	434 min (7 hr, 14 min)	2022
La Roue	413 min (6 hr, 53 min)	1923 (Restoration, 2019)
Florentina Hubaldo, CTE	367 min (6 hr, 7 min)	2012
The Best of Youth	366 min (6 hr, 6 min)	2003

What is the longest movie delay ever?

The longest delay between the completion of a movie script and the making of the movie was 32 years in the case of The Doctor and the Devils (UK 1986).

What movie is age every 30 minutes?

Plot – Guy and Prisca Cappa are going through a separation. To avoid saddening their young children Maddox and Trent, the couple take them to a tropical resort as a final family vacation. At their hotel, Guy and Prisca are given complimentary drinks and the children befriend Idlib, the resort manager’s nephew.

1. At night, Maddox and Trent overhear their parents arguing and play a message decoding game with Idlib.
2. The next morning, the manager invites the family to a secluded beach where three additional parties are present: rapper Brendan “Mid-Sized Sedan” and his female companion; surgeon Charles, his elderly mother Agnes, his wife Chrystal and their young daughter Kara; as well as Jarin and Patricia Carmichael, a close-knit husband and wife.

Trent⁠ discovers the corpse of Brendan’s companion. Charles grows suspicious of Brendan, who reveals that he has been experiencing nosebleeds because of his, After the children rapidly turn into teenagers and Agnes suddenly dies, the families conclude that the beach is aging them, with the occupants undergoing the equivalent of one year of aging every 30 minutes.

At least one member of each family has an underlying medical condition. They discover that trying to leave will result in them blacking out and waking up back to where they left. In a fit of rage, Charles cuts Brendan with a pocket knife, and the group watches as his injury quickly heals. After Prisca develops a, Charles performs a successful surgery to remove it.

Brendan discovers that the body of his companion has fully decomposed in a matter of hours. Kara and Trent continue to age, and after having sex with each other, Kara gets pregnant. She gives birth, but the baby dies due to the time rapidly passing. The attempts to leave grow increasingly tense as Charles’s worsening causes him to kill Brendan.

As the day goes on, Jarin drowns, Kara falls to her death, and Patricia suffers a fatal, Guy’s eyesight blurs and Prisca suffers hearing loss. Trent and Maddox discover the notebook of a previous traveler, along with indications of their being watched. At night, Charles attacks Guy and Prisca in a schizophrenic episode; Prisca runs as Charles continues to attack Guy.

Chrystal’s results in her bones rupturing, killing her. Prisca returns and slashes Charles with a rusted knife, instigating a fatal blood infection that kills him. An elderly Guy and Prisca make amends before dying moments apart from each other. With only the now-middle-aged Maddox and Trent remaining by the next morning, the pair construct a sandcastle.

They revisit a secret message given to them by Idlib, which Trent deduces is connected to an underwater coral passage. Believing that the passage will allow them to leave the beach without losing consciousness, he and his sister start swimming through the coral. After they seemingly fail to emerge from the water, a resort employee who is monitoring them reports that the entire group has died.

He gives the news to the manager, who mentions a previous incident where a guest almost escaped from the beach before announcing that trial 73 has concluded. It is revealed that the resort is a front for a research team from the pharmaceutical company Warren & Warren that was conducting clinical trials of new medical drugs, which are administered to guests with medical conditions by spiking their drinks.

Because the beach naturally accelerates the lives of the guests, the researchers have been able to complete the lifelong drug trials within a day. The researchers lure a new group to the beach, but are interrupted by Trent and Maddox, who survived their underwater swim, using the notebook as evidence that they gave to vacationing police officer Greg Mitchel, who informs his boss of the researchers’ crimes.

The researchers are mentioned to have been arrested with subpoenas sent to the rest of Warren & Warren as Greg plans to reunite Trent and Maddox with their aunt.

What is the first movie ever made?

What was the first film? – The first motion picture film is believed to be Louis Le Prince’s Roundhay Garden Scene. This film was recorded in Leeds in England in 1888. It is approximately 2 seconds long and shows some of Louis Le Prince’s family members walking around a garden. But how was it filmed? What was the first film camera like?

What movie took the most money to make?

The 30 most expensive movies ever made Some movies are made on a shoestring budget and end up becoming huge successes. That’s reason bang for your buck. On the other hand, some movies have massive budgets. You can usually see that on the screen, but not always. Paramount You would think there might be franchise fatigue by the fifth entry in Michael Bay’s “Transformers” series. They was definitely budget bloat, as this is the most-expensive film in the franchise, costing $239 million. Despite being the fifth movie in a not-exactly-beloved series, “The Last Knight” still made plenty of money worldwide. Disney No, not the original animated film from 1994. We’re talking about the 2019 remake with a lot of uncanny valley potential. It also had bigger names in the cast, including Beyonce. That probably went a long way to putting together its $250 budget. Of course, Disney is still making remakes of its old animated films, so they are plenty happy with the results so far. Warner Bros. “The Dark Knight” was huge. It won an Oscar. It largely is responsible for expanding the Best Picture nominations at the Academy Awards. It also probably helped “The Dark Knight Rises” garner a $230 million budget. Well, that and the fact it was the third and final film in a massive trilogy. Warner Bros. It’s way easier to get Batman movies going than Superman movies, for whatever reason. Think of how many successful Batman films there have been. Now think of how many successful Superman films there have been. After years without a Superman movie, we got “Superman Returns,” with Brandon Routh as the alien from Krypton. 20th Century Fox For years, “Cleopatra” was the pinnacle of excessive budgets. It’s the only movie on this list that came out before 1995. It cost $31.1 million at the time, but that’s $260 million in modern times. While he making of “Cleopatra” was a fascination for many at the time, the film did make back its budget – it’s the highest-grossing movie of 1963 – and it was nominated for nine Academy Awards. Warner Bros. It seemed like Will Smith could do no wrong. “Independence Day” and “Men in Black” were incredibly successful. “Wild Wild West” could have been the next massive blockbuster from the Fresh Prince. Smith’s reputation probably helped with the $170 million budget. Disney Disney has a ton of money on hand, which is why they can dip into the vault for some remakes. “Beauty and the Beast” is live action and stars, aka Hermoine Granger. It cost more than “The Lion King” remake, specifically it cost $255 million, but somehow this is the 10th highest-grossing movie of all time. It made over a billion bucks worldwide. No wonder they keep making remakes. 20th Century Fox It seems like “X-Men” series always peter out. Just look at “Dark Phoenix.” Speaking of which, Phoenix is also a character in “The Last Stand,” the third film in the original X-Men movie series. “The Last Stand” cost $210 million back in 2006, and while this is the highest-grossing film of the original trilogy, critics kind of found it wanting, and we don’t disagree. Disney We’ll be honest, we forgot that “Prince Caspian” even existed. We remembered “The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe,” the first film in this trilogy, but the trilogy quickly dissipated from our memory. The budget of “Prince Caspian” did not dissipate, though, as the film cost $225 million. Sony, Columbia Until the Marvel Cinematic Universe came around, to many “Spider-Man 2” was considered the pinnacle of superhero movie making. It still has quite a lot of respect, even though “Spider-Man 3” was kind of a bummer. Too much dancing Peter Parker.

Spidey’s battle with Doctor Octopus cost $200 million, but it was a smash success. Universal ‘s priciest movie isn’t a “Lord of the Rings” or a “Hobbit” flick. No, it’s his remake of “King Kong.” Maybe it’s that extended (some say overlong) run time. While this “King Kong” hasn’t been nearly as iconic as the original, the $207 million turned out an output of $562.3 million.

It was definitely a box-office success, even if the movie has been forgotten (and now has been overtaken by a new King Kong reboot). Disney The last two films we listed were tied for 20th when adjusted for inflation, so we have entered the top 20. And we enter with the most-divisive of the “Star Wars” films.

Personally, we’re big fans of Rian Johnson’s film. It cost $262 million, but it made over a billion dollars and is the ninth-highest-grossing movie ever, no matters what the naysayers think. Disney Next on the list is “The Last Jedi’s” sequel, and the final film in the new series. “The Rise of Skywalker” is considered a box office disappointment, which speaks to how prolific this franchise is.

The movie cost $275 million and made over one billion just like its two predecessors. However, it did make less money than the previous two films in the trilogy, which was probably a bit of a disappointment. Disney No, you are not mistaken. The three films that comprise the new “Star Wars” trilogy are back-to-back-to-back on this list.

The Force Awakens” was the first new “Star Wars” film in over a decade, and it came on the heels of a trilogy people generally did not like. They spent $259 million on this new film and cast quite a few folks who were not big stars. The gamble – and “Star Wars” nostalgia – paid off. “The Force Awakens” is the third-highest-grossing movie ever.

The Force was clearly with them, it would seem. Disney Wow, four “Star Wars” movies in a row! Of course, on the other hand, “Solo” is maybe the biggest flop in the history of the franchise, commercially if not critically. The attempt to give Han Solo a, well, solo movie had multiple directors and a lot of issues, not to mention a $275 million budget.

“Solo” was so lackluster it put the kibosh on more “Star Wars” standalone films. Warner Bros. Batman fought Superman! That has to be interestingright? OK, maybe not. Maybe Zack Snyder couldn’t get out of his own way. Ben Affleck was brought in as Batman, perhaps contributing to a $263 million budget. It did bring in plenty of cash – over $870 million worldwide, which is good because there were a lot of sequels planned.20th Century Fox People dismiss James Cameron at this own risk.

His films are often viewed skeptically until they hit theaters. There were those who didn’t believe in “Avatar.” It seemed weird and cost $237 million, making it one of the highest-budgeted movies at the time. Somehow (hint: the brief return of the 3-D movie fad) “Avatar” became incredibly successful, even taking over the title of the highest-grossing movie ever (not adjusted for inflation).

• Disney We don’t want to spoil anything, but you are going to find out the “Pirates of the Caribbean” franchise has really splashed a ton of cash.
• That can’t be all ‘s salary, either.
• Dead Man’s Chest” is the second film in the franchise.
• It cost $225 million, but it also kept the series going.
• Universal “Waterworld” has a reputation as a total fiasco, and the budget is a big reason why.

The film cost $172, which at the time made it the most-expensive movie ever, even adjusting for inflation. Yes, it outdid “Cleopatra.” However, like “Cleopatra” it did actually end up making money, if just barely. Unlike “Cleopatra,” the dystopian sci-fi film did not get much Oscar love at all.

• Hey, it was still better than “The Postman,” a true flop.
• Disney This one stings for everybody involved.
• How did “John Carter” become so expensive? It’s star was Taylor Kitsch, who was not exactly an A-lister at the time.
• Also, why did they change the title from “John Carter of Mars” to something so generic? They spent $263.7 million on making the film, and it ended up making $284.1 in the box office.

When you factor in stuff like marketing, it almost assuredly didn’t break even. A trilogy had been planned, but they never made a movie past “John Carter” in the series. Warner Bros. We begin the top 10 with the only Harry Potter movie to make the top 30.

• Why did this one end up so expensive? It was the sixth in the series, so that’s part of it we’re sure, but it wasn’t the final film.
• Of course, the series made so much money they got their financing back many times over.
• The Half-Blood Prince” cost $250 million, even though no other Harry Potter film came close.

Disney This is a strange one, because “Tangled” is a straight-up animated movie. Those usually don’t cost a huge amount of money, which is why we don’t really see them on this list. Then, there’s “Tangled,” which cost $260 million. A lot of money was poured into getting the animation right, as Disney had been struggling and the filmmakers wanted something that looked richer and more realistic.

All the effort paid off. The Rapunzel riff made nearly $600 million, revitalized Disney animation, and led to “Frozen” in many ways. Warner Bros. The plight of “Justice League” is well known. It includes an unshaveable mustache. There was also the fact that Joss Whedon had to take over for Snyder, who had to leave the film due to personal tragedy.

All that Snyder Cut talk is going to raise the money spent on “Justice League” in some ways, but the actual film that was released is the first on this list to cost $300 million. Unfortunately, in the minds of many it still can’t hold a candle to the MCU.

Sony, Columbia We talked about “Spider-Man 2” and how well-received it was, and how it compares favorably to the largely disliked “Spider-Man 3.” That doesn’t stop the third and final film in the Tobey Maguire series from getting a huge budget. The first two films were huge successes, and we guess they had to spend big onThomas Haden Church and Topher Grace? “Spider-Man 3” cost $258 million and the dip in quality and reception in part ended the series right here.

Paramount, 20th Century Fox Plenty of jokes were made. “Titanic” was the first movie to cost $200 million. The budget skyrocketed. People were saying that the film was as much of a disaster as the actually sinking of the Titanic was. Then, James Cameron shut everybody up.

1. Titanic” was, for over a decade, the highest-grossing movie ever.
2. It won 11 Oscars, including Best Picture and Best Director.
3. ‘s “My Heart Will Go On” because an inescapable hit.
4. Yes, Cameron and company spent a crazy amount of money.
5. The gamble was worth it.
6. Disney You are about to find out just how much Marvel and Disney have spent on the “Avengers” movies.

Opening the top five is the penultimate of those films, “Infinity War.” You can see where the cash went. The cast is huge and full of stars. They got everybody together for this one. There are epic fight scenes, and all those realistic computer graphics don’t come cheap.

“Infinity War” paved the way for the culmination of Marvel’s story by spending $316 million. Since the film made over $2 billion worldwide, everybody walked away just fine. Disney One year after spending $316 million on “Infinity War,” the story of the Avengers wrapped up with “Endgame,” a movie that cost $356 million.

That’s a lot of extra cash. Not that it mattered, of course. People were so enthused to see where the story of the Avengers versus Thanos ended that the movie made nearly $2.8 billion. It’s now the highest-grossing movie ever. Disney There was a huge jump in money spent from the second “Pirates of the Caribbean” movie to the third one.

This film cost a whopping $300 million, which is $370 million adjusting for inflation. There must be people who love this film series, even if it doesn’t get as much attention as, say, the Marvel movies or Batman movies. “At World’s End,” a movie we don’t know anything about other than it exists, made nearly a billion dollars.

Maybe these movies are loved overseas? Disney That’s right, this is the most-expensive Marvel movie. You don’t even need to adjust for inflation to make that true. “Age of Ultron” cost $365 million to make. We aren’t sure why the most-expensive Marvel film is the second Avengers movie.

It was kind of received in lukewarm fashion as well, and it’s arguably the least-liked of the four “Avengers” movies. Disney The priciest movie, adjusted for inflation or otherwise, is a “Pirates of the Caribbean” film. “On Stranger Tides,” the fourth movie in the series, cost $378.5 million to make. That’s $430 million adjusted for inflation.

No other movie cost over $400 million using current rates. This is notably the film where Will and Elizabeth ( and Keira Knightley) don’t appear. Instead, Penelope Cruz is Depp’s costar. Also, Keith Richards makes an appearance. Maybe that is where all the budget went? Regardless, the movie did make over $1 billion worldwide, so the money spent was made back and then some.

What movie took 10 years to make?

Overview of films with long production times

Film	Release year	Number of years
A Letter to Momo	2011	7
A Tree of Palme	2002	10
The Act of Killing	2012	8
The Adventures of Chatran	1986	4

What is the longest Netflix movie ever?

6. The Longest Movie on Netflix – The longest movie on Netflix was ” The Irishman,” directed by Martin Scorsese. The film has a runtime of 3 hours and 29 minutes and features an all-star cast, including Robert De Niro, Al Pacino, and Joe Pesci. “The Irishman” is a crime epic that spans several decades and tells the story of a hitman’s involvement with organized crime in post-World War II America.

Has there ever been a 5 hour movie?

4 Happy Hour – Ryūsuke Hamaguchi Happy Hour is a Japanese drama film that runs for five hours and 17 minutes, and was directed by Ryusuke Hamaguchi, who helmed Drive My Car, the Best International Feature Oscar-winner, It follows a group of four female friends, getting into the details of their lives and loves.

Jun admits to her friends that she’s been having an affair and wants to divorce her husband, a fact that her other friends don’t take lightly. They come around, however, and as they support her in trying to win the court case to get divorced, their own love lives twist and change as their stories intertwine.

Despite not being professional actors, the four lead actresses shared the best actress award they won at the Locarno Film Festival.

What is the longest Disney movie?

Runtime: 126 Minutes – Coming in at 126 minutes, Fantasia is by far the longest Disney movie. This feat is all the more stunning in light of the fact that there have been nearly 60 films since then. That said, this movie is broken into 8 segments or episodes, each performed in sync with different works of classical music.

Is Avatar 2 the longest movie?

Avatar 2 runtime confirms it’s one of the longest movies ever made The release of The Way of Water is now mere weeks away. On 16 December, the sequel to James Cameron’s wildly successful Avatar finally lands – and I’m sure someone out there is excited about that fact.

It may be one of the most successful films of all time, but Avatar lacks any kind of cultural impact. It’s a strange beast of a film – one that most people have seen, yet few remember in detail. Check out the trailer for The Way of Water below. The film’s runtime has finally been confirmed and prepare yourselves friends, it’s a long one.

The Way of Water officially runs for 192 minutes – or three hours and 12 minutes if you want to break it down. James Cameron confirmed the fact to, To compare, that makes The Way of Water a full 30 minutes longer than its predecessor – and you thought Avatar was long.

What’s particularly cruel about this runtime is that the film is quite literally about water. Trying to avoid a toilet break whilst you’re watching water slosh around for over three hours isn’t the most comfortable of experiences. Don’t complain to James Cameron though. He doesn’t want to hear it. Earlier this year, Cameron “I don’t want anybody whining about length when they sit and binge-watch for eight hours.

I can almost write this part of the review. ‘The agonisingly long three-hour movie’ It’s like, give me a f**king break. I’ve watched my kids sit and do five one-hour episodes in a row. Here’s the big social paradigm shift that has to happen: it’s okay to get up and go pee.” You’ve been warned.

What is the longest Harry movie?

1. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban – The importance of Prisoner of Azkaban to the Harry Potter film series cannot be overstated. This is the movie that established the creative direction and formula for the films that followed, as the series faced a crucial issue post- Chamber of Secrets,

How does one adapt increasingly lengthy books into satisfying feature films? The solution: everything that is told from Harry’s point of view or that directly affects his character goes in, everything else is fair game for being dropped. But it wasn’t only the POV rule that Azkaban established going forward; it was also the freedom to get creative— really creative.

Director Alfonso Cuarón significantly altered the look and feel of Harry Potter without completely removing what Chris Columbus had built in the prior two films, while at the same time expanding the depth of the characters and, well, getting weird. From the Knight Bus sequence to the Hogwarts choir (plus frogs) to the Dementors, Prisoner of Azkaban is absolutely tactile—you can feel this world.

And it’s a testament to Cuarón’s vision and cinematographer Michael Seresin ‘s beautiful photography that nearly every frame of film on this thing looks like a painting. The irises, the Whomping Willow marking the changes of the season, the camera move through the clock—this thing is filled to the brim with unforgettable imagery.

Azkaban is also the film in which Radcliffe, Grint, and Watson really come into their own as actors and begin to forge a path that makes these characters their own. Radcliffe, in particular, shines opposite Gary Oldman and David Thewlis, as the character’s unending search for a father figure continues.

1. And Cuarón and Co.
2. Had the unenviable task of recasting Dumbledore following the great Richard Harris ‘ passing, but Michael Gambon picks up the baton beautifully—his performance neither tries to emulate Harris’ nor does it dishonor the actor’s previous characterization.
3. And while the time turner business is executed to perfection ( Azkaban really is one of the most streamlined stories in Rowling’s book series), simply telling the story is not enough for Cuarón—everything is in service to character, which in turn services the film’s thematic throughline of burgeoning adolescence.

As they enter puberty, these young characters begin to forge a path of independence, and Cuarón captures this wonderfully in manners both subtle (each actor wears his or her uniform slightly differently in this film) and obvious (Harry “running away from home” at the beginning).

How long is Avatar 3?

Avatar 3: The James Cameron epic sequel is rumored to have a nine-hour cut set for Disney+ As Cameron feels six overall films weren’t enough to tell the story of the Na’vi, he will be completing a nine-hour cut of the third film. Avatar: The Way of Water has exceeded expectations to become one of the highest-grossing movies ever. The sci-fi epic sealed Cameron’s fate in bringing the rest of his vision to the big screen. And as Cameron knows — there is no fate but what we make for ourselves.

One of the fates that Cameron is rumored to be making is a nine-hour cut of Avatar 3, The massive, massive narrative would be broken down into a limited series and released on Disney+, according to, Cameron boldly filmed both The Way of Water and its follow-up back-to-back, and the third movie is said to now be in its huge post-production process.

Avatar 3 is still intended to be released theatrically with all the bells and whistles on December 20, 2024. However, this would likely be a more manageable runtime at a mere three hours. It was reported that last year Cameron submitted a nine-hour cut to the studio, and he is planning on doing the visual effects for the entire thing, then whittling it down for its feature presentation in theaters.

1. If the report is true, Cameron is seeing to it that all that work will not go to waste by releasing the whole thing as a limited series following the theatrical run.
2. After the release of Avatar: The Way of Water and its runtime exceeding that of the first, it has been sort of a running joke online that the further sequels would sport unimaginable lengths.

Even with Cameron’s reputation for going big and never going home, a rumor of a completed nine-hour cut still comes as a shock. Since the sci-fi auteur is planning to release at least five sequels in total, it’s a relief that he isn’t planning on releasing the nine-hour cut theatrically in parts, especially given Cameron’s aversion to streaming.

For Avatar 3, Cameron has said that he will be exploring another part of Pandora which will feature a tribe of evil Na’vi called the, Actress Oona Chaplin had been cast to play the leader of the tribe. Then, it was announced that one of the sequels would see Neytiri finding herself visiting Earth. However, Cameron has also said that he is wanting to squeeze in a pet project about before continuing to Avatar 4,

: Avatar 3: The James Cameron epic sequel is rumored to have a nine-hour cut set for Disney+